Results: CT Clinical Practice: 3D rendering
Software 1. We have "Fly Through" software, not the "Colonography" package. This seems to be a bit difficult to use from a technologist point of view. Will the results be the same? Should I have any concerns using this software? From your experience, how often will the radiologists have to be involved with the actual fly through process? At this time, they do not use the workstation.
2.
We have Siemens Emotion 6 with only standard MIP, MPR and SSD methods
in 3D. We are looking at beginning CT colons, which can be viewed in
flythrough on our Navigator. However, if we want to use the colon package,
we have to purchase a Wizzard also. Which do you recommend? Do you find
the flythrough helpful anywhere else, and have you heard if the flythrough
has any results in the GB or Common Bile Duct?
3.
Have you ever used flythrough to see the GB, bile duct stones, and have
you used it to view bladder wall, etc? Also can you just use fly through
instead of purchasing colon software? I read all the latest posts of
VC. Siemens tell me that I can't have colon until June on a Leo; however,
they would like to sell me a Wizzard with fly and colon. How do you
feel about just doing fly on the colon instead? I really enjoy this
site. I am recommending it in a memo to all 45 physicians and PA's.
4.
Anyplace to get more info on the software upgrades for the Virtuoso?
|