 View Case Studies
One of the areas of greatest interest with multidetector CT is in the evaluation of the coronary arteries. The interest is in part a follow through of developments with the electron beam CT scanner (EBCT) where there was significant research as to the ability to detect and quantify coronary artery calcification. Coronary artery calcification represents the presence of artherosclerosis and is a potential indicator of significant coronary risk in the future. The presence of any calcification is indicative of coronary artery disease. Whereas stress testing is usually positive with a 50% stenosis, CT detection of coronary disease may be able to detect disease at an earlier stage. Currently the goal would be to obtain a baseline in a patient and then do follow-ups to determine progression of disease and determine if medical intervention (i.e. diet, medication, etc.) is successful in reducing the risk of a cardiac event. Although the timing of follow-up studies is still under evaluation many centers recommend a follow-up at 3 years. Multidetector CT is now being used for the evaluation of the coronary arteries by using prospective cardiac gating. Although there has been some controversy as to the merits of MDCT versus electron beam scanning the consensus is that they provide similar information. An advantage of MDCT is its inherent higher spatial resolution which may result in increased detection of even minimal calcification. An ECG-tracing of the patient is done and a delay time of about 80% of the RR interval is selected to try to define the diastolic phase of the heart. With multislice CT with a 500 ms rotation time we obtain 250 ms temporal resolution. A typical scan of the coronary arteries can be obtained in about 15 seconds with 4 adjacent slices obtained per perspective ECG-trigger. Calcium scoring is based on the Agatston scoring algorithm, which was developed for EBCT scoring. A CT threshold score of 130 HU is selected and a coronary score for each of four main coronary branches (left main coronary artery, left anterior descending coronary artery, circumflex coronary artery and right coronary artery) is obtained. The score is computer generated by measuring the volume of coronary calcification (mm2) and multiplying it by a factor (between 1 and 4) based on the peak attenuation value of the lesion. The scores are stratified to a scale with 4 categories; no calcification, minimal calcification, moderate calcification and extensive calcification. A lack of calcification correlates with a lack of coronary artery disease (95% negative predictive value), while a higher score can give a prognosis concerning risk from a myocardial event. The typical scoring system can also be divided into score and their clinical significance. One of the scoring systems with clinical significance is listed in table 1. One of the article that clearly shows that helical CT and EBCT are essentially of equal value was by Carr et al. found that "A general purpose, current generation helical CT scanner equipped for retrospective cardiac gating can accurately quantify coronary calcium, and the results are highly correlated to scores obtained with electron beam CT." We are currently using a Siemens Somatom Plus VolumeZoom scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ) for our coronary artery study. Our protocol consists of:
We use prospective gating for all of our studies. Because of some concern for Agatston score reproducibility on EBCT scanners we are routinely obtaining two acquisitions for each patient. Our results on our first hundred patients have shown little interscan variability with no changes in risk stratification. Although it is uncommon to find significant stenosis of the coronary arteries in the absence of vessel calcification, it still may occur in around 8-9% of patients. There is now interest with multidetector CT for the detection of soft plaque or non-calcified plaque. These plaques are more likely to rupture causing acute myocardial infarction. Currently the gold standard for detection of these lipid rich lesions is intravascular ultrasound. In order to do this with MDCT we must do a CT angiogram with iodinated contrast material and the use of 1 mm collimation and retrospective cardiac gating. Preliminary results have been promising but additional correlative studies will be needed. Coronary artery calcification scoring is an easy exam to do technically and the scoring process is equally simple. Some limitations on the significance and reliability of the study include:
Despite these conclusions the consensus panel still reached what might be called a split decision in their recommendation; "Although preliminary data are intriguing with respect to risk prediction in the asymptomatic patient, available data are insufficient to support recommending EBCT to asymptomatic members of the general public or for routine clinical use. Further studies are enthusiastically recommended for determining the additive predictive effect of the calcium score in patients with intermediate risk, particularly in the elderly. The use of EBCT in selected asymptomatic patients can be justified when performed in the context of a medical assessment only after the more standard cardiac risk assessment is considered insufficient by the physician to direct further therapy plans."
Some recent articles on the subject include:
"A general purpose, current generation helical CT scanner equipped for retrospective cardiac gating can accurately quantify coronary calcium, and the results are highly correlated to scores obtained with electron beam CT."
Interscan Variation in Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification in a Large Asymptomatic Patient Population
"Interscan variation remains an important limitation of electron beam CT in the examination of asymptomatic patients."
"Although preliminary data are intriguing with respect to risk prediction in the asymptomatic patient, available data are insufficient to support recommending EBCT to asymptomatic members of the general public or for routine clinical use. Further studies are enthusiastically recommended for determining the additive predictive effect of the calcium score in patients with intermediate risk, particularly in the elderly. The use of EBCT in selected asymptomatic patients can be justified when performed in the context of a medical assessment only after the more standard cardiac risk assessment is considered insufficient by the physician to direct further therapy plans."
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||